PMI Crest
The key to making your pension fund more sustainable
5 March 2021

The key to making your pension fund more sustainable

Insight Partner

“So, Mr Chief Executive, we really like what your company is doing in relation to environmental improvements and we’re pleased to see you’re working effectively towards your net zero climate change pledge. It’s also encouraging to see your positive policies on diversity across all aspects of your business. But what are you doing to make your pension fund more sustainable?”

We’ve maybe not got to this type of conversation in boardrooms across the UK, but it’s only a matter of time until we do. Many organisations are working hard within their own businesses to become more responsible - not just because they feel they have to, but because they believe that it’s the right thing to do from a financial perspective. But at the same time, many of these companies’ pension schemes are doing little or nothing to reflect the organisation’s own Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) policies in their Defined Contribution (DC) pension scheme investments. This, we believe, will need to change over the coming years.

There’s been an increased interest from government and regulators in where pension scheme money is invested, as well as a drive towards greater disclosure. The new requirements in relation to the Taskforce for Climate Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) will bring this even more clearly into focus. Trustees must now set out in their Statement of Investment Principles (SIPs) how they will deal with Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues, and climate change specifically. Implementation Statements will need to provide details on how the trustees and their managers are putting their policies into practice. Independent Governance Committees (IGCs) of contract-based arrangements have a raft of new responsibilities to consider in relation to providers’ ESG policies. We’ve already completed the reviews for both IGCs and Master Trust trustees to benchmark the responsible investment credentials of their providers – with some interesting results.

At this point in time, the reality is that chief executives of most UK companies will have little or no idea of where their company pension scheme’s default investment strategy is invested. Most likely, they will have opted out of the scheme due to annual or lifetime allowance issues. But, with all aspects of a company’s business coming under increasing scrutiny (and in some cases, contracts being won or lost partly on a company’s ESG practices), now is the time for them to take a greater interest.

We’ve found that many of our clients have already started to consider the way in which the pension scheme is invested and how this dovetails with the company’s wider policies on Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR). Several

clients have invited their company’s CSR managers to present to the trustees or governance committees to outline their current policies and future plans. This has then led to informed and inclusive discussions about how the investments of the pension scheme shape up against the company’s policies and plans.

For some clients, we’ve already started to see a genuine desire to better reflect the values and plans of the company within the pension scheme. We’ve been able to explore, with them, the funds and strategies that are currently available to DC pension schemes which might bring the two closer together. As a result, some have directly changed the investment strategies of their default arrangements. Some have wanted to go even further and work with their fund managers to explore whether more bespoke strategies could be built to enable better alignment to take place.

For those within single trust schemes, this tailoring of a default strategy can be achieved relatively easily. It’s harder to achieve this through the ’off the shelf’ default strategies of Master Trusts or contract-based arrangements, but for those companies with the appetite to do this, tailored strategies can be built with many of the leading Master Trusts and Group Personal Pensions (GPP) providers.

We’re still in the early stages of developments here, but we fully expect this to become a greater area of focus, certainly for larger company schemes going forward. As many of you will know, we’ve made changes to our own staff pension scheme here at Hymans Robertson to help us align more closely with the direction of travel of the firm as a whole. We see this as a journey rather than a final position, where we can develop our strategy over time to reflect both the changing market background and the products that are available.

If you’re not doing so already, we challenge you to assess how well your own pension scheme aligns with the CSR policies and plans of your sponsor – and to be bold enough to make changes where you believe this is warranted.


This article was featured in Pensions Aspects magazine March 2021 edition

back to Pensions Aspects Magazine

Last update: 23 April 2021

Rona Train
Rona Train
Hymans Robertson

Pensions Projects Specialist – Very Flexible working

Salary: £35000 - £45000 pa

Location: Essex or Hampshire – Very flexible working

Pensions Quality Analyst

Salary: £25000 - £40000 pa

Location: Work for Home or Office locations countrywide

Client Relationship Manager

Salary: £30000 - £50000 pa

Location: Bristol / Home based with need to attend Bristol office

You may also like:

PMI Scotland Seminar - the new normal?
08 October 2021

PMI Scotland Seminar - the new normal?

On 4 August 2021, the PMI Scotland Regional group held a webinar to discuss ‘the new normal’ for the financial services sector in Scotland, in light of the lifting of COVID-19 restrictions. Four panellists lead the discussions.

Read more
Will the new TPR super code improve scheme governance?
16 July 2021

Will the new TPR super code improve scheme governance?

The consultation on The Pensions Regulator’s (TPR’s) new Code of Practice closed on 26 May. Whilst we await the outcome of the consultation, given the aspiration to put the Code into practice by the end of 2021, it may be that changes are limited. Assuming they are, will the Code improve scheme governance?

Read more